Readeck companion browser extension
Total ratings
4.85
(Rating count:
13)
Review summary
Pros
- Works really well with no issues for most users.
- Fantastic performance as reported by satisfied users.
- Overall great functionality appreciated by users.
Cons
- Does not recognize some web pages and asks to save a selection instead of saving the page directly.
- Compatibility issues with Firefox on Android.
- Fails to work with private servers that don't use HTTPS.
Most mentioned
- The addon's general effectiveness and ease of use.
- Issues related to page recognition functionality.
- Desire for better compatibility with different browsers.
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.80
All time rating average:
4.85
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
2025-01-02 | Mike | ||
2024-11-13 | Axel Leroy | ||
2024-11-01 | Siddhartha | ||
2024-10-30 | Firefox user 12236262 | Works really well, no issues at all. | |
2024-10-30 | Eddy Nottingham | Working great for me so far, thank you this is fantastic! | |
2024-09-13 | Mapu | The addon works well, although I have two issues (not really issues- more like preferences): 1) I'd prefer the beahvior to be similar to the Pockt addon- click, add tags, or not- and then the page is added. This would be preferred to the current sidebar opening 2) The extension doesn't recognize a fair number of web ages as such, and asks me to save a selection. I'd prefer that the page is simply saved as is. The extension is GREATLY appreciated. | |
2024-09-10 | andyhuggs | ||
2024-09-02 | askold | Great addon! Would be great to have a version compatible with firefox on android though. | |
2024-07-10 | Mark | ||
2024-06-17 | Odd Unicorn |
Upgrade to see all 13 reviews